TMI US

Dolphin Relationship Aquarium

LEADERSHIP FROM WITHIN 
with JAMES KOUZES 
Part 2 of a 4 Part Series
  
  

THINKING ALLOWED 
Conversations On The Leading Edge 
Of Knowledge and Discovery 
With Dr. Jeffrey Mishlove
COPYRIGHT (C) 1998 THINKING ALLOWED PRODUCTIONS 
Reprinted with permission from Thinking Allowed Productions 
 
 

  

MISHLOVE: Well, leaders are people with vision, people who are able to articulate a vision and enlist other people in sharing that vision, getting other people to want to help out in that vision -- I suppose as opposed to managers who can kind of manipulate the rewards-and-punishment system to force people to comply with stated goals and objectives. 

KOUZES: Again, if you take the distinction between leading and managing, and if we take a look at the traditional way we approach the subject, traditionally managers are viewed as people who use rewards and punishments in order to control other people's behavior. So we have incentive systems established in business to offer people rewards, whether it's stock options, or whether it's a salary increase or a promotional opportunity or a wonderful new assignment in a new location, something that will advance the person's career -- we're looking at bonuses at the end of projects. All of those are available to business people, and we tend to rely upon them. There was a book written called The Great Management Principle not too long ago, and the great management principle, the author said, was what gets rewarded gets done. Well, we questioned that notion, because in our research it wasn't the extrinsic rewards that people were valuing, it was something intrinsic, something that came from within, some sense of a dream, some sense of aspiration or a goal, something that for the greater good, common good, was important. They wanted to go for that, not just the extrinsic rewards. And in fact many were rewarded extrinsically, but it wasn't that external reward or the avoidance of punishment that drove them, but something from within, as well as the people that they enlisted. 

MISHLOVE: I guess, then, the key to finding that leader within oneself is to find that area where we find ourselves intrinsically rewarded for what we're doing. 
'
KOUZES: Yes. The research is very clear. If you look at the five hundred plus cases that we collected from average folks that would be our next-door neighbors, as well as from a few people that are better known, you would find that the nature of that experience has a great deal in common across many different disciplines, many different professions -- and that is that the nature of the experience as people identified it was challenging, exciting, stimulating, rewarding. Nobody ever said, "I did my very best as a leader when it was boring, dull, and uninteresting." What seems to be the motivational force is some challenge, some difficult circumstance, a problem to solve, a discovery to make, a journey to go on. And that's where it begins. You had mentioned leaders are visionaries; they have a vision. But in fact we found that the process doesn't start with vision, it starts with some sense of dissatisfaction, some sense that the world is not working the way it should, or their business isn't working, or their family, or the church, or the community. And what they're attempting to do first is to struggle with the challenge that's in front of them, and then the vision appears or comes to them over time. I like to refer to it as, "Visions begin as we are driving in the fog." You know there's a mountaintop out there, but you can't quite see it, and it's hidden by the fog and the clouds, but as the sun shines on that fog, it lifts. The more you shine the light -- reflection, concentration -- just letting it be for a while, and sit there and the natural light shines on it, it will become evident to you. 

MISHLOVE: It seems as if -- if we can draw on the analogy of the mythical journey of the hero again -- it's the journey into the underworld; it's being willing to face what disturbs you, to look at that darkness squarely and to shine the light on it, rather than to kind of run away. 

KOUZES: Absolutely, absolutely. Any person in a leadership role has experienced some crisis in their life, whether it's Martin Luther King, who had to face people who were threatening to him when he was at the seminary, and he felt the urges to attack and fight back, but again by reading Gandhi and understanding that Gandhi had a similar experience in his life and wanted to fight and fight back, his dedication to his nonviolent philosophy was even strengthened and he was self-assured in that process. So directly facing it -- looking inward and dealing with that, or looking outward and having to deal with your enemies, your detractors, the people who don't necessarily agree with the direction, and being able to feel comfortable with yourself. 

MISHLOVE: One of the quotes that I enjoyed the most in your book The Leadership Challenge was you said an engineer has his slide rule, a computer professional has his computer, but the tool of a leader is himself or herself.

KOUZES: Thinking again of anyone who has to give from within in order to work with other people -- that's the only instrument that we have. If you're a musician, you at least have some aid in the process. That doesn't make it any less difficult to play; but in fact all the leader has is him- or herself -- skills and abilities, attitudes, feelings, emotions. This is what we have, and how people see us using that has a lot to do with whether or not they'll follow us. 

MISHLOVE: Many people have no image of themselves as a leader. Even though when you question them about their personal best they'll have a story of leadership, if you ask them, "Are you a leader?" they say, "No, not at all, not me." 

KOUZES: It's absolutely true that many people, if you ask them about whether they see themselves as leaders, will deny it, but in fact if you ask other people that they've worked with, particularly during these times of personal best, they'll say absolutely, this person demonstrated those qualities. I think it's because we've created this whole other mythology about leadership, and that's perhaps the negative side of the hero mythology -- that we've created the Luke Skywalkers and the Lee Iacoccas of the world. People say, "I can't possibly be like that," without really thinking about times when they have behaved in similar ways, taken on challenges, whether it's with the local community, or whether it's the church or the school. And it angers me a bit, because we end up saying, "Well, you can't develop leaders. We can't be better. We have to wait around until some Messiah arrives and saves us from ourselves." In fact, our belief is that most people have demonstrated these, and we would do well to believe more that we can develop leaders, because if we believed that we would spend more energy to do it, and in fact all of us would be better off if we believed that we could develop ourselves as leaders. 

MISHLOVE: There is a delicate balance here. You know, there's the old saying, "Too many cooks spoil the soup," and in many organizations people are expected to lead, but within limits, not too much. 

KOUZES: Well, in a recent experience we had, we set out to study four leaders and put them on videotape and to use them as a case example. My colleague Tom Peters, who was the principal investigator in this, found, as he said, "I looked for four leaders and found four thousand." That's the essence of our message. When everybody is leading, when everybody is saying we're not happy with the status quo, we're continuously improving -- we don't look for satisfaction in work anymore. We have a phrase, "We don't go to work; we go to continuously improve. We don't want satisfied customers; we want customers who are delighted with us. We don't want satisfied employees; we want employees who love it around here." With that kind of attitude we're constantly challenging ourselves to do better, and in that sense we are leading. We have a good idea, we make a suggestion. It challenge the way we are currently doing things, but at least we can share that idea, that vision, that dream, that hope, with others, enlist them in it, get their support, be an example to others, encourage other people, and in that process we're leading. 

MISHLOVE: There are many factors, however, in our culture, and particularly in the way organizations are structured, that tend to mitigate against leadership. 

KOUZES: Absolutely. In our research we found something very interesting. When we asked superiors, "What do you want from your leaders; when you look up or you look out for leadership, what do you want?" they said, "We want people who are honest, competent, forward looking, and inspiring." And then we asked those same people, "What do you want in a follower?" They said, "We want people who are honest; we want people who are competent; but we want people who also are cooperative and dependable." So we want vision and change and newness and dreams and hopes from leaders, but from followers those same people don't want those things. Those are much lower on the list. What they want are dependability, loyalty, and cooperativeness. There is a tension there. We create organizational systems that tend to get people to submerge their desires to make the world a better place, and we make it possible only for those in charge to be in control of the vision or the strategy of the company. And so you're right; we do create systems, we create procedures, structures, that mitigate against people learning to lead and taking the lead. 

MISHLOVE: Well, are you suggesting that this is unhealthy, or that we don't need to do this -- that there's another way? 
KOUZES: I'm suggesting that you can do everything perfectly as a leader and still get fired. Our expectations of leaders and followers are in conflict. There's a conflict between loyalty and leadership often, and as organizations we must be constantly vigilant, particularly in difficult times, that we listen a little bit more to people with radically different ideas, because those ideas in fact be the ones that help us to improve and grow and develop, both as individuals and as organizations. So we must be vigilant of our tendency to want to have loyal, dependable, cooperative followers, while at the same time saying, "Jeffrey, I really think you should develop your leadership skills. We need more leaders around here." We not mean it; our actions demonstrate otherwise.
 
 
 

End Part II. Join us next month for Part III of this interview with James Kouzes.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Previous "Dolphin Relationship Lagoon" pages:
 
    #1 How to Develop Self Esteem
    #2 Love Them, Anyway
    #3 Perf Measurements at Call Centers
    #4 Staff Empowerment
    #5 Team Training for Your Teams
    #6 Handling Confrontations
    #7 Social Support
    #8 The Power of Influencing...
    #9 Expectations
  #10 Impression
  #11 Learning Through the Ages
  #12 Instructions for Life
  #13 More Instructions for Life
  #14 Inner Feelings with Virginia Satir
  #15 More conversations with Virginia Satir
  #16 What I've Learned in Life
  #17 What Do You See?
  #18 If the World Were a Village...
  #19 Lessons from Noah's Ark
  #20 Discussion with Albert Ellis, Part I
  #21 Discussion with Albert Ellis, Part II
  #22 Discussion with Albert Ellis, Part III
  #23 Discussion with Albert Ellis, Part IV
  #24 Discussion with Albert Ellis, Part V
  #25 Discussion with Beverly Potter, Part I
  #26 Discussion with Beverly Potter, Part II
  #27 Discussion with Beverly Potter, Part III
  #28 Discussion with Dennis Jaffe, Part I
  #29 Discussion with Dennis Jaffe, Part II
  #30 Discussion with Dennis Jaffe, Part III
  #31 Discussion with Dennis Jaffe, Part IV
 #32 Discussion with James Kouzes, Part I
Please e-mail or fax us any ideas you have about improving your relationships and communicating better. Your statements don't have to be lengthy. Your contributions will be meaningful to TMI's website visitors. Thanks. 

 


 


TMI US
8270 West Charleston Blvd
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117

tel: 702 939-1800
fax: 702 939-1804
email: 

Website designed by 
©2005, TMI US